[Pga_europe_process] Who's coming?

Nina skrati at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 21 17:39:02 CEST 2004


I think that postponing the global conference is a
good idea. If PGA Asia finds a couple of dates with a
reason in late August or early September we could
maybe even discuss that at the wintermeeting if it
happens early enough.

Possible postponing of the global conference doesn't
change the fact that the PGA Europe wintermeting
should happen soon since we need to find out about the
new conveners and search for funds might be related to
that to a certain extent as well. And don't forget:
We're looking for (a) new convener(s)!! (more than a
hint, I know)

To make it easier for the Wob Marley people: could we
have a virtual show of hands to see how many people
are thinking of attending the wintermeeting if it
happens end of November or beginning of December??
Could you try to come back to the list in the next
couple of days?


--- Diañu Burlon <dianhuburlon at gmx.net> wrote:

> HI,
> well, I though that in the call for the conference
> it was clear why the 
> dates was chosen in the first place.
> The idea is not just having a conference to
> socialize, but having a 
> conference for a reason. I mean, to real networking
> preparing a common 
> strategy and a common plan of action, and not just
> chatting each other. 
> Taking this into account, one of the important
> issues Asia has to deal with 
> (clearly among other thousand of them) are
> agreements of WTO, for example 
> the horrible Agricultural Agreement (AoA). One of
> the proposal was to take 
> again the first plan of the PGA, when global
> conference took place three 
> months before the WTO in the way it would have time
> to organize global days 
> of action (pga conference in february 98 = three
> months before of the wto 
> ministerial conference in May 98. Birth of the
> global days of action).
> So, the idea that some movements are discussing is
> the preparation of local 
> demostration against WTO conference, instead of
> spending big amount of 
> human and economical resources in going to Hong
> Kong.
> Besides with local, district and state, national and
> regional level of 
> demostration, the issues will be strongly introduce
> into the village, the 
> people.
> We don't have to forget that the position of the
> Indian goverment in Cancun 
> was the consecuense of a huge mass farmer
> demostration since 2000 against WTO.
> So, this is why from Asia it was proposed to have
> the global conference 
> three months before the WTO conference, in the way
> the organizartions would 
> have time to organize local movilizations, even
> starting weeks before the 
> WTO conference.
> Personally I think that to organize such event as a
> huge international 
> conference the targets have to be quite define. I am
> one of those people, 
> calling things like the social forum the
> "socializing fourm". The idea is 
> sitting together for something else than having a
> chat, exchange emails and 
> information and coming back home.
> I am not now sure whether the call for the global
> conference is in the pga 
> web. It was distributed in Belgrade (last page of
> the magazine with the 
> report of the pga asian and gender conference in
> Dhaka).
> If you don't have it, I will try to look for it (I
> don't have it in this 
> computer)
> I've not been in the last meeting regarding this
> issue in Nepal. So, I just 
> wrote what I was told by telephone. I will meet with
> a delegate from 
> Bangladesh and India in a few days, and I would be
> able to tell you more 
> about it.
> One of the reasons I understood it was better to
> delay, it was to have more 
> time for funding, for organizing the caravans to the
> conference and the 
> whether. From Europe I understand that move it to
> september would make 
> possible for the organizers of the movilizations
> against G8 to participate 
> in the process of the conference.
> saludillos
> trasgu
> At 12:10 PM 10/21/04 +0000, you wrote:
> >just to throw a thought in here, which might be odd
> since I ended up not
> >getting to go the belgrade as I had planned so many
> probably have no clue
> >who I am . . .
> >
> >moving the global conference because the WTO moved
> its meeting really does
> >make it seem like the whole thing is a reactionary
> project on some level.
> >if the reasoning is that may is a bad month then
> maybe moving the
> >conference makes a little sense - but then would
> wonder why may was ever
> >chosen in the first place.
> >
> >cheers and solidarity,
> >stevphen
> >
> >
> >
> > > hi everyone,
> > > the wto conference has been delayed till
> december next year. So, it would
> > > be possible to delay the global conference till
> end of august beginning of
> > > september. This is being discussed among Asian
> groups.
> > > As in London many people expresed their worries
> regarding the G8
> > > preparations and so on, maybe delay the
> conference would be a solution.
> > > So, it could be great if you discuss regarding
> this and send a proposal to
> > > asian list.
> > >
> > > saludillos
> > > trasgu
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pga_europe_process mailing list
> > > Pga_europe_process at squat.net
> > >
> > >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Pga_europe_process mailing list
> >Pga_europe_process at squat.net
> _______________________________________________
> Pga_europe_process mailing list
> Pga_europe_process at squat.net


Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!

More information about the Pga_europe_process mailing list