[Pga_europe_process] Re: pga europe winter meeting
ror at aseed.antenna.nl
Sat Nov 6 10:06:58 CET 2004
following the discussion, though I see Katica¹s argument, many people agree
that the sooner we have the winter meeting the better. if possible I think
it¹d be better not to wait until February.
could we please get back to Nina¹s proposal where she is asking more people
to announce here on the list what dates would be good for them. how much
will a meeting in January clash with what they are organising for DAVOS? are
many people going to be away because of WSF? and if they are, will they be
back already two weeks later? maybe, as the winter meeting should gather
Representatives for groups, it will be possible to hold the meeting with
groups that are interested without it necessarily taking forces away from
just as nina I¹m worried about it being too late in time, mainly for the
caravan which will happen (if it happens) before the actual conference and
thus is even shorter of time :-(
and just as Katica I have as well my own personal reasons. I will not be
able to attend any meetings in Europe after February 1, as I will be away
far far away. but then again, there will always be people who will not be
able to come.
kate_basis at yahoo.com 's virtualised vision 29/10/04 12:43:
> I'm not sure about other people from Belgrade, but I prefer having
> wintermeeting in February, after Davos and WSF.That will leave people to
> relax, but would also help in organising themselves and all stuff about winter
> It's just too much to prepare for wm and other stuff at the same time.
> I guess, many people who would like to be on a wintermeeting, won't come
> becouse they need some time for peparation of Davos and wsf, or at least a
> little braek before that.
> So, I propose meeting in February.
> I have personal reasons also for not having wintermeeting in January.
> If we agree about January, unfortunatly I won't be able to come, which is not
> good becouse that meeting is a chance to discuss necesary stuff about Nepal
> and the caravan, starting from Belgrade, and of course about next PGA
>> good for us!
>> but still we need a date for this meeting and i want to repeat our
>> suggestions for this (plus why we chose those dates - and NO it should not
>> be a voting on those dates but we need to fix it somehow!)
>> we were always taking the thursday as arriving date and sunday as the ending
>> 20-23.january (this is one week before davos and wsf - maybe some people are
>> moving at this time anyway..)
>> 10-13.february (this is about two weeks after the wsf and davos - this would
>> leave people time to relax or whatever between the wsf/davos and the
>> 17-20 february (is again one week later and will leave even more time).
>> for us all three dates will be ok.
>>> > You are quite right. Funding work should start right away and we shouldn't
>>> > wait for the meeting, we should have some people working on it already so
>>> > that some proposals could be on the table at the meeting.
>>> > And as far as I know no one is on to it for the moment. I am sending this
>>> > to two people of the Asia support group, as requests to foundations should
>>> > probably come from the asian hosts. Have you already any ideas, texts,
>>> > elements for a budget or whatever?
>>> > Olivier
>>> > PS Well there were some very nice people from Australia in Cochabamba, and
>>> > it would be nice and warm in december...
>> Pga_europe_process mailing list
>> Pga_europe_process at squat.net
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> Pga_europe_process mailing list
> Pga_europe_process at squat.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pga_europe_process